Mercuriosities

Napoleon’s carriage

Napoleon’s carriage became a highly prized possession after his defeat at the Battle of Waterloo. After accompanying him on many military campaigns, it was seized as one of the spoils of war and later exhibited in London. Other memorabilia from the Battle were also in great demand.

“On Friday, Buonaparté’s carriage taken at Waterloo, recently brought to this country, was exhibited to the Regent at Carlton-house, in its complete state, accompanied by the officers who took it, and a number of English and foreigners of distinction.  The driver, in his full dress, sitting on the near pole horse, drives the four horses with a whip, the thong of which is about three yards long ; but he manages the horses principally by talking to them.  The two leading horses are at such a distance from the other two, that there is nearly room for two more.  The horses are good stout dark bays, of English cut and appearance, very like a mail-coach set of the best description.”

Stamford Mercury, 10th November 1815

Lost in Translation

Translation is a tricky business, with false friends and idiomatic phrases just waiting to catch us out. We all know the Inuit have more words for snow than we have, rather more even than national rail services, but who would have interpreted ‘Felicissima notte‘ to mean anything other than ‘Good night’, without knowing local customs?

“THE ITALIAN GOOD NIGHT.– In Northern Europe, we may, without impropriety, say, ‘good night’ to departing friends at any hour of darkness ; but the Italians utter their ‘Felicissima Notte‘ only once.  The arrival of candles marks the division between day and night, and when they are brought in, the Italians thus salute each other.  How impossible it is to convey the exact properties of a foreign language by translation !  Every word, from the highest to the lowest, has a peculiar significance, determinable only by an accurate knowledge of national and local attributes and peculiarities.–Goethe.”

Stamford Mercury, 14th August, 1829

What in Heaven’s Name?

There are over 100 types of clouds, according to the World Meteorological Organization’s International Cloud Atlas. Whether it was unusual clouds that appeared over Grantham in 1829, or a sign from the heavens, something strange was in the air as the sky over the town was transformed into something never before seen .

“On Tuesday evening the 6th instant the inhabitants of Grantham were agitated by a very extraordinary appearance in the heavens: about half-past seven o’clock the Eastern and Western parts of the horizon seemed as two prodigious columns of fire issuing from immense volcanoes; the clouds were extremely disturbed, and the rack, riding in opposite directions, portended an elementary war. The vane and steeple of the church were quite illuminated; and the effect produced upon the houses in the town (principally of brick) is scarcely to be described: they reflected a strong fiery red, and appeared as if viewed through one of Claude Lorraine’s glasses of that color. During the time of the curious appearance, which was nearly half an hour, the air was particularly close and warm: a considerable degree of anxiety was depicted upon the countenances of all who viewed the phenomenon, and in the impression of religious awe which the mind received, the beautiful idea of the Royal Psalmist was strongly enforced, wherein he describes the Supreme as “riding on the wings of the winds and directing the storm!” The unusual appearance had vanished by eight o’clock, but in the mind’s eye of those who had sensibly beheld it, left a trace which will long continue.”

Stamford Mercury, 16th August, 1811.

Polyandry, or deceived by his frail rib

Although taking multiple husbands is quite rare, a case of polyandry was heard at the Old Bailey in 1829. The Court found the woman’s manner to be ‘most audacious’ before sentencing her to transportation.

“At Bow-street last week, Hannah Andrews, alias Goodman, alias Eagles, alias Reynolds, a good-looking, stout Welsh woman, about 28 years of age, was charged with poligamy, having, it is said, no fewer than six husbands !  Two of the men attended to prove the case against the lady.  The first was Henry Goodman, a tall, handsome man, about 30 years of age, who has respectable connections at Worcester and Birmingham.  He was attending Wolverhampton market in May last, when the lady introduced herself to him, and by dint of insinuating manners soon wooed herself into his good graces : they touched upon marriage, and having apprised him that she had property at Cheltenham worth 1400l., besides a tolerable sum in ready cash, she said she was a widow, and of all men she had seen he was most to her fancy.  Mr Goodman soon became equally pleased with her, and her attractions had so blinded him, that she actually took him to the Wolverhampton bank, and contrived by a bold manoeuvre to persuade him that she had 395l. lodged there !–Within a month they were married, and soon after the happy pair proceeded to Worcester, to visit Mr. G.’s brother, a professional man ; whence they were to proceed to Cheltenham, to view the property there, but at Worcester the fair dame feigned illness, and to Cheltenham Mr. G. proceeded alone, and soon found (to use his own words) that all her estate was in the ‘Isle of Sky !’  It was true that she had hired some premises, which she had never occupied, and during her visit to Cheltenham, she had contrived, by some well-managed tears, to dupe a lawyer of 20l.  Upon his return to Worcester, the husband found that his frail rib had left that place within an hour after his departure for Cheltenham, and had proceeded to Birmingham, where she had obtained property of tradesmen, in his name, to a considerable extent, had carried off from his house all the portable property he possessed, and had then decamped.  He had afterwards the satisfaction of finding that she had three other husbands.–A similar ‘tale of woe’ was told by a Mr. Eagles, another husband, whom she plundered to a much greater extent.  The woman conducted herself in the most audacious manner during the examination, laughing loudly, and ogling first one man and then another.– She was convicted on two indictments at the Old Bailey sessions, and sentenced to seven years’ transportation for each offence.”

Stamford Mercury, 30th January, 1829.

Wife-selling in the 18/19th centuries, continued

Wife-selling didn’t always go to plan as one local Rutland man discovered.  Four further articles in our occasional series on the custom of wife-selling in the UK during the 18th and 19th centuries.

“From a Correspondent.–‘The system of trading in human flesh seems not confined to the shores of Africa–for, to the shame of all parties, a few days ago a husband absolutely sold his faithful rib at Sutterton, near Boston, for the pitiful sum of three farthings ; and delivered into the bargain her paraphernalia, a shoulder of mutton, basket, &c.–The ridicule and the detestation which attend such transactions admit of no mitigation.’

A man recently appeared in Macclesfield market with his wife, whom he brought there for sale with a halter round her neck ; a bargain was soon struck, and she was disposed of for a sum somewhere between three and four shillings; which coming to the ears of the worthy Mayor of that borough, he caused the parties to be apprehended, and the husband, wife, and purchaser (who strove to show he was only an agent in the business), have each been committed to Middlewich house of correction until the next quarter sessions for the county of Chester. ”

Stamford Mercury, 7 November 1817.

wife-selling

“A short time since, William Would, of Toynton St. Peter’s, sold his wife to a labouring banker, for two guineas.  She was delivered in a halter ; and in consideration of the purchaser’s taking an infant child, Would provided a leg of mutton and plum pudding, gave the banker one bed and bedding, and spent the day in getting drunk.”

Stamford Mercury, 9th July 1813.

“A very curious cause was tried on Monday ! A man sold his wife to another man, for one guinea, and delivered her up with a halter about her neck. Some time after he demanded his wife, and the buyer refused the demand ; whereupon the husband who sold her took out an action against the buyer for detaining his wife.– The jury gave a verdict in favour of the buyer, and the fool of a husband lost his wife, and had costs of suit to pay also.”

Stamford Mercury, 17th March 1786.

“At the late quarter sessions for the county of Rutland, a very proper example was afforded of proceedings to punish the infamous disregard of public decency, the sale (as it is called) of a wife.  A short time ago, we noticed a disgraceful transfer of this sort which had occurred in the parish of Clipsham : at the sessions at Oakham, an indictment for the misdemeanor was preferred, at the instance of the Minister of the parish, against Mr. Richard Hack, the purchaser, and the Grand Jury found it a true bill.  The trial was traversed by the defendant till next sessions. –Though, in this instance, the purchaser is selected for prosecution, it is only, we believe, because he is the more opulent man, and therefore the fitter person to make an example of : the seller, with every other person concerned in the disgraceful proceeding, is equally liable to prosecution for the breach of public decorum.”

Stamford Mercury, 29 January 1819.

The Elephant Man

We note that Jo Vigor-Mungovin, Joseph Merrick’s biographer, has discovered his grave in the City of London Cemetery. Merrick was known as ‘The Elephant Man’ due to his deformities. He died in 1890. A poignant film, starring John Hurt in the title role, was made in 1980. As you might expect The Stamford Mercury published several pieces about him.

Elephant Man

The Elephant Man. – Mr. F. C. Carr Gomm, chairman of the London Hospital, in a letter to the Times, brings to public notice a most exceptional case. He says:-“There is now in a little room off one of our attic wards a man named Joseph Merrick, aged about 27, a native of Leicester, so dreadful a sight that he is unable even to come out by daylight to the garden. He has been called “the elephant man” on account of his terrible deformity. I will not shock your readers with any detailed description of his infirmities, but only one arm is available for work.” An appeal is then made for funds to enable the victim of this terrible affliction to spend the few remaining years of his life in seclusion and comfort.

Stamford Mercury, 10th December, 1886

Elephant Man

DEATH OF THE “ELEPHANT MAN.” – Joseph Merrick, the unfortunate man who, owing to his strange deformities, was known as the “Elephant Man,” has died at the London Hospital, in which institution he had resided as a patient for about five years. A post-mortem examination has been held. – An inquest was held on Tuesday. Charles Merrick, hairdresser, Church-gate, Leicester, identified the body as that of his nephew, and gave his age as 29. His parents were in no way afflicted, and the father, an engine-driver, is alive. Mr. E. O. Ashe, house surgeon at the London Hospital, said deceased had lived at the institution four or five years. It had been expected he would die suddenly.

The man had great overgrowth of the skin and bone, but did not complain of anything. The exact cause of death was asphyxia, the back of his head being so greatly deformed that while the patient was taking a natural sleep the weight of his head overcame him and so suffocated him. The Coroner said there could be no doubt that death was quite in accordance with the theory put forward by the doctor. The jury accepted this view and returned a verdict to the effect that death was due to suffocation from the weight of the head pressing on the windpipe.

Stamford Mercury, 18th April, 1890.

A Wansford Wobble

It’s strange to think of the places we see and live in as anything other than how they are now. It is thought that probably from Saxon times the Old Bridge across the Nene at Wansford carried the earliest versions of the Great North Road; very different from our experience. The bridge we see today dates mainly from about 1600. In 1811, however, part of Wansford bridge (currently a listed structure!) toppled into the water below as a cart and horse met with a coach. In 1929 the Great North Road (A1) moved from its centuries old route to the east of Wansford.

“A few days ago as a cart, horse, and boy were passing over Wansford bridge, they were unfortunately met by Eclipse coach, when all the former were precipitated into the water, together with several yards of the wall: by an extraordinary interposition of Providence, the boy and horse, notwithstanding the fearful height from which they fell, were rescued from the water almost unhurt.”

Stamford Mercury, 1 March 1811.

A Tipsy Cow

There are plenty of animals that are said to get drunk on their travels. Honeybees can get drunk off of tree sap and are often attacked by their sober companions, elephants on sweet fruits and monkeys in Caribbean hotel resorts sneaking sips of cocktails purchased by their guests. In 1829, one cow belonging to a merry man called John Bull decided it was her time to get tipsy.

“DRUNKEN COW.- John Bull is often drunk, why may not his cow get tipsy sometimes? A curious affair took place at Bulwell, Notts, on the 6th inst.: Mr. Adin, having been brewing some ale against the feast, set it outside the building to cool; a cow, attracted to the spot by the odour, tasted it, and finding it as pleasant to the palate as it had been to the smell, actually drank the whole, consisting of twelve gallons and a half! It did not seem to do her any harm.”

Stamford Mercury, 16 October 1829.

Fire at The Crown Inn

With heartbreaking scenes unfolding in Paris upon the fire of Notre Dame, it brings to mind the sadness many would feel if some of our own beautiful buildings in Stamford went up in flames. There are many jaw-dropping spaces dotted around the town that no doubt fear the consequences of a fire – in 1811, however, The Crown Inn, now known as The Crown Hotel, suffered a scare of its own.

“On Monday evening, about nine o’clock, a fire was discovered at the Crown Inn in this place. It was occasioned by some fire having communicated (through a flue of the scullery chimney) to a beam in Mr. Piercy’s bed-room, and had probably been burning many hours before it was discovered by Mrs. Piercy, who had been attracted to the room by the cries of one of her children, (a fine boy about 3 years of age,) who had not long been put to bed. At the instant she opened the door, a column of smoke extinguished the light of a candle that she held in her hand, and the room was soon after in a blaze. Her cries quickly brought Mr. P. to her assistance, who, with great difficulty, and at the hazard of his life, tore down some stout wood-work, &c. and so fortunately prevented the flames spreading further; had an interval of five minutes more elapsed, the child must have perished, and the whole premises would, in all probability, have been consumed.”

Stamford Mercury, 12 April 1811.

Caught with pork in Stamford!

Stamford has been known for many things: the Bull Run, Mid-Lent Fair and its array of beautiful, listed Georgian buildings. However, in 1811, it was also the place where a Jewish man was caught and accused of eating Pork.

“An extraordinary inquiry is likely to engage the next court of quarter sessions for Boston, in matter of indictment for an assault commited in the Jewish synagogue in that town one day last week. – Whilst the Rabbi was engaged in his religious duties, one of the circumcised fraternity, a travelling pen-cutter, interrupted the solemnities, and reproached him (the Rabbi) with the sin of eating pork at Stamford some time ago!  A warm altercation ensued; and in the end the accuser was thrust out of the assembly, in such a way as induced him to apply to the magistrates for warrants against three of the persons who put him forth (named Moses, Israel, and Solomon), for an assault.  The warrants were granted, and the parties, we are informed, have since been bound in recognizances to appear at the sessions.”

Stamford Mercury, 7 June 1811.