‘The law is an ass.‘ Well, if these strange examples are to be believed, then Mr Bumble was correct! Let us hope that such inconsistencies have since been rectified.
“INCONSISTENCY OF THE LAW – If a man has a leg broken by a carriage, the law allows a deodand to his wife and children; but if he be killed, they have no compensation. – If a man grows cabbages or potatoes, the horses employed in cultivation his fields are taxed; but if he grows wheat or barley, his horses are not liable to the highest taxation: because, says the law, cultivating a field for the growth of cabbages or potatoes is not agriculture. – If a journeyman butcher happen to be employed on any occasion in serving in his master’s shop, the master is liable to pay tax for a shopman; but if a journeyman baker be so employed, his master is not so liable, because, says the law, the baker is a manufacturer, and the butcher is not.
At Union-hall, on Friday, one of the toll-collectors in the Kent-road was summoned for demanding toll for a post chaise, which was used in the conveyance of convicts to Woolwich. The toll-collector said he was aware that waggons and carts used for the conveyance of prisoners were exempt from toll, but he considered that a post-chaise was liable. The magistrate said, that all descriptions of vehicles used for the purpose above-mentioned were exempt from the payment of turnpike tolls. The defendant, therefore, refunded the toll and was fined in the mitigated penalty of 5s.”
The Stamford Mercury, 23rd November, 1827.